omegablast2002@yahoo.com e275a599b7
ok this may, or may not get me yelled at...but i can explain why i do it in rules...so don't kill me :( ...
added
"offerinterruptonphase=blah"
to the parsing of the rules.txt files...the reason i want to handle it inside the rules.txt....
originally i was going to use the options variable for this, then i realized that if i use that variable, it would apply it to every game mode and peoples custom games...so instead i added the parsing in the actual rules.txt files, this way, if we want to offer interrupt on phase blah to MTG, but NOT have this interrupt offered in a mod or different mode, or if the different mod or mode should offer you a chance to interrupt ai in a different phase ...you can set each rule to interrupt in the phase you want...
now for the reason i added it in the first place...previously we were allowed an interrupt when the opponent drew a card in the draw step, this gave us a chance to do stuff on opponents turn....
recently wololo i beleave made draw actions not use the stack anymore(which was a good change, since as per MTG rules the actions of drawing is not a stack action)...but as a side-effect, we lose our chance to interrupt ai and do stuff on ais turn....
also, changed the ingame bonus thing, to start recording stuff towards bonuses on turn 2+...this solves reported issues with story mode "setting up" causing massive bonuses to be gained for doing nothing.....
2011-05-10 17:08:08 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-04 01:33:34 +00:00
2011-05-02 11:28:04 +00:00
2011-05-05 14:27:46 +00:00
2011-03-13 21:19:02 +00:00
2011-05-05 14:27:46 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-10 11:37:46 +00:00
2011-04-22 13:12:36 +00:00
2011-04-28 05:01:06 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-29 17:30:57 +00:00
2011-04-28 05:01:06 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-22 13:12:36 +00:00
2011-02-08 15:12:14 +00:00
2011-04-20 07:50:00 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-02-10 17:19:11 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-06 06:40:00 +00:00
2011-02-10 17:19:11 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-24 10:33:38 +00:00
2011-04-23 13:24:19 +00:00
2011-05-08 09:06:56 +00:00
2011-04-22 11:17:20 +00:00
2011-01-30 13:06:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-20 07:50:00 +00:00
2011-04-23 13:24:19 +00:00
2011-04-29 17:30:57 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-24 17:58:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-04 10:02:47 +00:00
2011-04-28 07:49:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-07 11:58:37 +00:00
2011-05-05 06:18:50 +00:00
2011-04-23 09:54:19 +00:00
2011-05-08 09:06:56 +00:00
2011-05-06 06:40:00 +00:00
2011-04-26 06:08:53 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-03-02 13:41:24 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-29 13:24:02 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-03-13 21:19:02 +00:00
2011-04-23 08:43:34 +00:00
2011-04-20 07:50:00 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-10 17:08:08 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-15 14:17:34 +00:00
2011-04-29 17:30:57 +00:00
2011-04-20 07:50:00 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-05-10 17:08:08 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-09 13:56:22 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-04-12 20:54:34 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-04-14 17:06:44 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2010-02-27 18:49:03 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-05-05 06:18:50 +00:00
2011-04-20 06:27:44 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-04-12 20:54:34 +00:00
2011-01-30 11:14:36 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-31 10:24:06 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-04-21 22:48:22 +00:00
2011-04-22 13:12:36 +00:00
e275a599b7