omegablast2002@yahoo.com 76653b6f54
going to go ahead and commit this now as updating the ai decks to use this tool is going to be a huge task...i originally wanted to commit this when i had a substantial amount of ai decks using it, to show case how it makes a huge difference. ...
it is a feature that is for ai deck building
what it will do is as follows
#NAME:sample deck
#DESC:The forces of fire and nature unite.
#DESC:
#DESC:Can you withstand
#DESC:their combined fervor?
toggledifficulty:lotus petal|black lotus (*) * 4
grizzly bear (*) * 4
someCard (8) *4
notice the toggle dificulty?
syntax is ....toggledifficulty:easy card name or number|hard card (optional set if both belong to same set otheriwse use * ) *howmany
toggledifficulty:frying pan|machine gun
toggledifficulty:tomatoe|pumpkin (MBS) * 3
toggledifficulty:tomatoe|squash
grizzly bear (*) * 4
the above exsample as easy will have a deck with:
frying pan
4X tomatoe
4X grizzly bear
and on hard it will have:
machine gun
3x pumpkin
squash
4X grizzly bears
the entire deck can be built with toggledifficulty cards....its not limited to just a single use.
you can also mix it up, some can be toggledifficulty some can be just like normal, you are not limited to having to have a complete deck of toggled cards...
if your currently selected deck has an over all win ratio of 65% or higher...this deck will have 4 black lotuses in it...if youre overall win with the current deck you are playing is below 65% then those 4 black lotuses are replaced by 4 lotus petals instead...effectively making it an easier ai deck...
note, the 2 cards used are exsamples...its a great way to show you the potential this change can have...an ai deck with 4 black lotuses will do WAY better then the same deck with 4 lotus petal...if you catch my drift...
2011-02-11 18:01:50 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 20:18:56 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-10 19:50:09 +00:00
2011-02-02 18:22:08 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 20:18:56 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-08 15:12:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-02-10 17:19:11 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-05 22:21:49 +00:00
2011-02-10 17:19:11 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-02-06 14:50:02 +00:00
2011-01-31 08:38:14 +00:00
2011-01-31 10:04:18 +00:00
2011-01-30 13:06:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-28 17:34:49 +00:00
2011-02-06 11:35:40 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-24 17:58:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-09 13:21:26 +00:00
2011-02-09 20:42:19 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-01 14:24:41 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-02 18:22:08 +00:00
2011-02-11 18:01:50 +00:00
2011-02-03 00:04:11 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-06 11:35:40 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-09 14:33:09 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-01 19:11:43 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-06 11:35:40 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-08 12:24:39 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-02-02 18:22:08 +00:00
2011-02-01 05:58:19 +00:00
2011-01-28 06:00:51 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2010-02-27 18:49:03 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-02-05 06:42:53 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
2011-01-23 06:59:00 +00:00
2011-01-30 11:14:36 +00:00
2011-01-21 18:01:14 +00:00
2011-01-31 10:24:06 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
Resuming on my threading support work with the card caching mechanism. This change unfortunately touches quite a few files, but I needed to get it out of the way before things got out of hand: one significant hurdle is the assumed lifetime of a JQuad pointer. In a single threaded model, the life time of the pointer is clear: you fetch it into the cache, the cache makes room, you use the pointer immediately. In a multithreaded context however, it's unsafe, as the drawing thread can request a few JQuads, and the cache operating on a separate thread can potentially bounce a JQuad out of the cache before the draw routine is done using it, which ends up in an access violation when you attempt to draw using an invalidated quad pointer. To prevent this, the bulk of this change swaps out the use of naked JQuad* pointers in the code with a JQuadPtr, which is basically a typedef to a boost shared_ptr<JQuad>.
2011-02-01 10:37:21 +00:00
omegablast2002@yahoo.com
76653b6f54