Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
salmelo16
a06980a197 added new auto keys, this and thisforeach, functionallity similair to aslongas and foreach, but for properties of the card as opposed to cards on the field. More details in first comment. 2010-03-28 02:21:25 +00:00
solo81@web.de
a2987f7b0e This is another patch by salmelo.
It fixes several problems with the newly introduced improvements concerning Counters.

Added 8 successfully tested cards, 1 of them is DARK DEPTHS!

Daily_Build update

Complete list in the first comment.
2010-03-25 23:28:55 +00:00
solo81@web.de
07361b19f5 This is another patch by the great newcomer salmelo.
Salmelo:"Here is another patch, this time adding counters to target specifications, so now you should be able to target things with counters on them as well as use counters for criterion for Lord, aslongas, foreach, etc.
I had to muddle the syntax a little bit though, so heres an example, taken from gwafa hazid, whom I added to the primitives to test with.

lord(creature[counter{0/0.1.Bribe}]|opponentbattlefield) cantattack

obviously the part we are worried about is the counter part, note that those are curly braces { } and periods . instead of parentheses ( ) and commas , this is so that it does not conflict with how targets are normally parsed, which it did before I changed those. Counters still work the same way everywhere else though, you only need to use { } and periods in target code.

Also, you can use counter{any} to specify that it should look for things with any kind of counter on them, not just specific ones, this is used by Kulrath Knight, for example.

I also consolidated most of the code used to parse counter specifications, as it seemed unnecessary duplicating it three times.

Anyway, aside from this major addition, I also added Gwafa Hazid, Profiteer; and Kulrath Knight to the primitives, as well as a test file for each to make sure it worked.

Hopefully y'all will find this patch useful.

Oh, and I should point out that it only works with one Counter in the target specification, i imagine if you put two in the same one then it would either overwrite the first with the second or merge them into some sort of hybrid counter monstrosity, either way, I wouldn't suggest it. "

Cards with vanishing are also codable now. Have a look at the comments for explanation.

daily_build.
2010-03-24 21:15:34 +00:00